Sunday, September 11, 2016

JNU and the Left Academic Lumpenism

JNU and the Left Academic Lumpenism

Lumpenism and genocides of the worst kind are preserves of the left icons globally: Stalin(2.5 crore killings), Mao(4.5 crore killings); back home WB tops the  lumpenism chart in India, thanks to more than 30 years of the left rule there.

The left in JNU killed the basic spirit of social science enquiry and produced academic mediocres who concluded before collecting data. The academic prestige of JNU is sustained by sciences, NOT social sciences, humanities etc that are dominated by the left. Isn't it an act of  lumpenism that you stop a PM (Indira Gandhi) from speaking to the students?

 You welcome the Breaking India forces and oppose the entry of a Home Minister (P Chidambaram) or a renowned academic (Subramanian Swamy or Arun Shourie) to talk to the students and still want to be known as intellectually vibrant?

Diversity of views is key to intellectualism and JNU Social Sciences and Humanities Professors are known to have only prevented the opposing views from being articulated in the campus. Is this less than ACADEMIC LUMPENISM?

Just try to list five Social Science  journals published by JNU and five social scientists known for their seminal contribution from indigenous perspective. Indian Express or for that matter any newspaper is no authority to certify a university on academics.

The LEFT has failed globally as it has delivered only poverty and genocides. What's the reason for its romantic sustenance in JNU? Has any professor contributed substantially to the evolution of even socialist thought?

Just a natural question: what attracts you to the left and what global and national data you have to justify your association?

The Social Sciences(SS) Lumpenism in JNU hides behind the Sciences' Good Work. Hence, the academic fraud and anti-intellectualism of SS and allied subjects need to be exposed.

Anti-intellectualism of the Left is a proven fact globally. Science can/should research on Gomutra (or for that matter anything that comes as a scientific challenge) and come out with verifiable findings.

Rejecting research on a matter with ritual significance makes science itself a victim of ritualism by nullyfying the process of enquiry. I may not like a few things but that doesn't mean that my dislike should stop me from subjecting those things to enquiry. This is what turned Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot into mass-murder machines.

No comments:

Post a Comment